It's really a shame the audio on this very relevant and important work is such poor quality. Many of the audience questions are not miked, leaving listeners to guess what answers are relating to. The Dr.'s mike is so soft much of the time I cannot understand what is being said. I really do not mean to be critical, it's just the subject is so very important and so much world class (professional) expertise has been invested, it's a horror to render it incommunicable by this low level technical inadequacy. I know there had to be some interesting information going on on screen while the camera was focused on the back of the Dr.'s head, not showing the projector screen.Sorry again for complaining, bur Damm.
Post your comment on this topic.
Dennis K McGee wrote: Feb 24, 2023
It's really a shame the audio on this very relevant and important work is such poor quality. Many of the audience questions are not miked, leaving listeners to guess what answers are relating to. The Dr.'s mike is so soft much of the time I cannot understand what is being said. I really do not mean to be critical, it's just the subject is so very important and so much world class (professional) expertise has been invested, it's a horror to render it incommunicable by this low level technical inadequacy. I know there had to be some interesting information going on on screen while the camera was focused on the back of the Dr.'s head, not showing the projector screen.Sorry again for complaining, bur Damm.